LASSnet celebrates a historic judgment
The law benders
Vinay Sitapati
Posted online: Friday , Jul 03, 2009 at 0324 hrs, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/the-law-benders/484408/
New Delhi : You seem to have gathered much evidence that homosexuality is not a disease,? Chief Justice A P Shah told the petitioners arguing against Section 377 in court, ?unlike the (other side?s) lawyers, who have argued that ?homosexuality is a matter of fun?.? The asymmetry in legal arsenal is no coincidence. The petitioners, Naz Foundation along with ?Voices against 377?, had an army of young lawyers to wade through India?s Byzantine case law history, refer to parallels across the world and produce affidavit after affidavit. And they all did it for free. The lead lawyer for ?Voices against 377? was Shyam Divan. Helping him were a host of lawyers armed with impressive degrees. Shrimoyee Ghosh, Jawahar Raja, Arvind Narain, Mayur Suresh and Vasuman Khandelwal are all young lawyers from National Law School, Bangalore.
Naz Foundation, the petitioner, was represented by Anand Grover from law firm Lawyer?s Collective. His arguments focused on linking health concerns of homosexuals to their ?right to privacy?, in turn linked to their right to dignity. Assisting him were Trideep Pais, and Tripti Tandon ? involved with the case since the beginning. Shivangi Rai and Mehak Sethi, both from India?s top law schools, rejected the lure of high paying corporate jobs to fight the case. ?We are not just activists,? Rai says. ?So we use our legal skills to make a persuasive case in court, not just shrill rhetoric.?
Why did they fight for free? For Mayur, it was his own gay identity, while for others like Vasuman it was the need to accord dignity to homosexuals.
- Vikram Raghavan On Naz Foundation - Part 1
There have been few, if any, cases whose proceedings have been closely followed and judgment keenly awaited as Naz Foundation. The verdict was eagerly anticipated, not just by lawyers and court watchers, but also by activists and a broad cross-section...
- Vikram Raghavan On Naz Foundation - Part 2
Wednesday, July 08, 2009 http://lawandotherthings.blogspot.com/2009/07/navigating-noteworthy-and-nebulous-in_08.html Navigating the Noteworthy and Nebulous in Naz Foundation -- Part II Having celebrated Naz Foundation?s glorious ramparts yesterday, I...
- Is The Naz Foundation Decision The Roe V. Wade Of India?
Is the Naz Foundation decision the Roe v. Wade of India? There are surprisingly few constitutional cases in India which have had the same symbolic power that cases like Roe v. Wade (affirming the right of abortion) or Brown v. Board of Education (dissolving...
- Kalpana Kannabiran On The Dhc Judgment
Date:06/07/2009 URL: http://www.thehindu.com/2009/07/06/stories/2009070655810800.htm Back Opinion - Leader Page Articles From ?perversion? to right to life with dignity Kalpana Kannabiran The Delhi High Court judgment makes the articulation of LGBT rights...
- Shrimoyee Nandini Ghosh
Shrimoyee Nandini Ghosh graduated from the National Law School, Bangalore, and has a M.Res (Masters in Research ) from Birkbeck College. She worked at the Majlis Legal centre as a practising lawyer, between 2003 and 2005, litigating on issues of conjugality,...